Lessons from the previous stimulus and recommendations for the future — Transportation for America and Smart Growth America

https://smartgrowthamerica.org/app/uploads/2020/04/SGA-T4A-Lessons-from-the-2009-Stimulus.pdf

Between 2009 and 2010, the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA, commonly known as “the stimulus”) gave states $26 billion in flexible dollars to spend on surface transportation capital projects and $8.4 billion in funding for public transportation capital projects. Because the purpose was to create jobs, the funds came with the requirement that states report how they spent that money, and how many jobs they created with it.

The United States now needs another stimulus. …

This report reviews broad lessons from transportation spending in the last stimulus, especially how that spending was used to varying degrees of success to create jobs and support short- and long-term recovery. …

STUDY FINDS PUBLIC TRANSIT, WALKING AND BIKING OPTIONS COULD HELP KEEP MILLENNIALS IN WISCONSIN

New report shows young adults in the state want alternatives to car culture

For Immediate Release
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2019

MADISON – A new WISPIRG Foundation study released today found that investing in public transit and walking and biking infrastructure could help Wisconsin attract and retain young adults. The report, entitled Millennials on the Move, also indicates that Wisconsin’s current transportation policy priorities – which have focused on expanding major highways at the expense of maintaining existing infrastructure and funding public transit, walking and biking – will fail to create the type of system young adults desire and Wisconsin needs.

“Car culture no longer represents the ‘American Dream’ for many young people,” said Emma Fisher, WISPIRG Foundation organizer and lead author of the report. “By rethinking our transportation spending priorities and focusing on forward-thinking investments, we could make Wisconsin more attractive to the young people that our communities need to thrive.”

To better understand the changing preferences of young Wisconsinites, WISPIRG Foundation staff and volunteers surveyed more than 600 college students on 24 Wisconsin campuses during the 2017-18 school year. The key findings of the survey include:

76 percent of respondents said it was either “very important” or “somewhat important” to have transportation options other than an automobile to get around.

75 percent of students surveyed said it was either “very important” or “somewhat important” to them to live in a place with non-driving transportation options after graduation.

55 percent of students surveyed said they would either be “somewhat more likely” or “much more likely” to stay in Wisconsin after graduation if they could live in a place where trips for work, recreation and errands did not require a car.

“As Madison continues to compete in an ever more aggressive workforce market, we must do everything we can to create a quality of life young people crave,” said Jason Ilstrup, President of Downtown Madison, Inc. “A sense of place is more important than ever. By creating a modern, multimodal public transportation system, we will send a message to all young people that they are welcome to build their home in Madison, Wisconsin.”

Millennials on the Move highlights several Wisconsin communities, from Eau Claire to La Crosse to Madison, that are already working hard to integrate multimodal, 21st century transportation options, and that are effectively attracting young adults. Madison – where local officials have created a network of protected bike paths and lanes, improved walkability and pedestrian safety, and developed a robust public transit system – is considered a great place for young people to live. Millennials made up 26.8 percent of the city’s population in 2015, which is the fifth highest percentage of Millennials in any U.S. city.

Mick Rusch, Metro Transit’s marketing and customer service manager, said, “Metro Transit is currently working with city leaders to explore options for a new east-west bus rapid transit line to make our city’s transit system faster, smarter and more attractive.”

“When my family was looking to purchase a home in Madison, we were looking for a location with easy access to the places we work and spend our free time,” said to Malorie Hepner, architect with OPN Architects. “Our home is near major bus routes, one block from a bike boulevard, is within walking distance on many amenities, and still allows for car use.”

“These findings should give state leaders pause as they put together the next transportation budget,” Fisher added. “Creating a modern and effective transportation system starts with rethinking our spending priorities. Wisconsin’s leaders should stop wasting resources on highway expansions that are unlikely to meet tomorrow’s transportation needs. Instead, we should focus on maintaining the infrastructure we already have in place. We must also invest ambitiously in public transit within communities and between cities and in the walking and biking infrastructure that will make Wisconsin a better place to live for people of all ages. ”

###

The Wisconsin Public Interest Research Group Foundation is an independent, non-partisan nonprofit that works for consumers and the public interest. Through research, public education and outreach, we serve as a counterweight to the influence of powerful special interests that threaten our health, safety or well-being.

www.wispirgfoundation.org

Survival Coalition 2019-2021 Transportation Budget Priorities

Transportation is the number one concern identified by people with disabilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • DHS reform the Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) brokerage;
  • DWD request additional $1.8M each year for Employment Transportation Assistance (WETAP);
  • DOT request an additional $2.5M each year for rural and regional mobility management;
  • DOT request a 10% increase each year for specialized and public transit as well as 18M to restore previous cuts to transit funding;
  • DOT request continuing appropriation lines for coordinating, operating, improving, and developing regional public transportation;
  • DHS require inclusion of transportation as a component of employment outcomes for LTC participants.

Read full document at TRANSPORTATION BUDGET PRIORITIES

Wisconsin’s 2015-17 Biennial Transportation Budget

This “highlights” document by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s Office of Policy, Finance and Improvement provides a fairly good summary of the transportation component of Wisconsin’s final biennial budget (Act 55). Transit Operating Aid programs are discussed on page 8. They remain in the transportation fund. The budget includes the 4% increases for transit that were allocated in the 2013-2015 budget but that obviously does not make up for the 10% cut to transit funding received in the budget before that. The Budget also creates a new Transit Safety Oversight program and insists that any fixed guideway rail system (streetcar) in Milwaukee County be paid for entirely by the City of Milwaukee.

Although all local transit systems must provide complementary transportation services to people who cannot use regular transit, there is also a separate program for “specialized transportation” (page 9). Eligibility for the Capital Assistance Program for Specialized Transportation is changed from age 55 to 65 to “meet programmatic changes to the federal program under MAP-21.”

The Complete Streets program is eliminated entirely. Although this summary does not specifically mention the term Complete Streets, the language under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) section (page 10) makes it clear that it is eliminated. All State funding for TAP is eliminated completely although federal funding remains.